.NET Tutorials, Forums, Interview Questions And Answers
Welcome :Guest
Sign In
Win Surprise Gifts!!!

Top 5 Contributors of the Month
Gaurav Pal
Post New Web Links

Page_Load Order -- Inserting a record

Posted By:      Posted Date: August 29, 2010    Points: 0   Category :ASP.Net
Is there any way to make sure an Insert Command happens before the Page_Load Events? I'm having a problem with inserting, then reading the DataSet directly after.  It seems it processes too quickly, or prior to the record being inserted. It has an impact on the DataSet that is to be displayed on screen. Summary:  Page_Loads > Finds Saved Data > If None exists (string contains 2 types of matches) > Displays the 1 of 2 types randomly. Buttons 1 & 2 Insert their respective options > Page Posts Back > Page_Loads > Read Saved Data > If my Max amount of the 1 of 2 types of Data are reached, the remaining type is shown > Displayed on page The problem I am having is that my DisplayDataSet is not getting the correct values.  It seems it's always 1 record behind on the count, because the count happens so fast, it's not getting the record that was just inserted. How can I write this, or make sure the "Find Saved Data' Routine happens after the Insert has been preformed?  Imports System.Data Imports System.Data.SqlClient Partial Public Class Assessment1 Inherits System.Web.UI.Page Protected Sub btnINS1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) Handles btnINS1.Click Dim connetionString As String Dim connection As SqlConnection Dim adapter As New SqlDataAdapter Dim s

View Complete Post

More Related Resource Links

Cast error when inserting record with Linq (to Sql)



I'm getting  the following error message: 

Unable to cast object of type 'System.Data.Linq.DataQuery`1[Username]' to type 'Username'.

I've been searching but can't find a solution.  This particular table has 4 columns. The first column is the int indentifier.  Column 2 is "username" (varchar50) and is the primary key.  Column3 is "userID" (uniqueidentifier) and column 4 is "active" (varchar5) .

            Dim dc As New DataClassesDataContext
            Dim c3 As New Username With {.userID = userGuid, _
                                    .username = userCustomName, _
                                    .active = "False"}


        Catch ex As Exception
            Throw ex
        End Try


>>>Check duplicate while inserting record from Texbox.

Hi, On inserting record, I want to check that for example if a user enters a telephone number for any record is already in the database then it should validate that the number already exists in table and you cannot enter a duplicate value. Then if user will provide some other telephone number then he allows to insert record. For insertion of record I used ObjectdataSource. User will enter telephone number in a simple textbox. I may want to inform that I am working in asp.net2.0 and also not allowed to use any third party control or ajaxtoolkit. Any idea would be appreciated.

help on triggers inserting record problem?


I have created a trigger and i want to insert a record in emp table whenever i insert i must get the confirmation that record is added i want to do this

using triggers.

USE [mine]
/****** Object:  Trigger [dbo].[insert2]    Script Date: 10/03/2010 09:06:59 ******/
ALTER trigger [dbo].[insert2]  
   on [dbo].[emp]  
    for insert  
    declare @sno int,@result varchar(50),@empid int,@name varchar(50)  
    select @empid=empid,@name=@name from emp where @empid=empid 
    insert into triglog values (@empid,@name)  

above is my code emp is my primary table and triglog is the table where i want to get the confirmation that data is aded when a new record is inserted into emp,actually i want to know when a new record is added? is there anyway to know this when i execute the code im getting error like inserting null values into sno and result but how to pull the values from emp and enter it in triglog im confused help with this??thanks.

Problem inserting a record into database

I created a table with a foreign key:
Create table Products
    Pro_ID int Primary key not null, 
    Client_ID int Foreign key (Client_ID) references Client_Details not null,
    [Prod_Name] [varchar](50) NULL,
    Prod_Description varchar(50) null,
    Purchase_Date DateTime Not null,
    Price Money null,
    Delivered int null
I need to populate that table with some data:
insert into Products (Pro_ID,Client_ID,Prod_Name,Prod_Description,Purchase_Date,Price)
values(2024,102,'Valuation Roll 2001','Property Values for 2001',Getdate(),15000)
When I run the query I get an error:
The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK__Products__Client__03317E3D". 
The conflict occurred in database "valrollclients", table "dbo.client_details", column 'client_id'.
The st

Inserting new row in GridView in ASP.NET 2.0

The GridView was not designed to insert new rows, but there is a way to accomplish this with very little code. This article shows how to do that. The GridView was not designed to insert new rows, but there is a way to accomplish this with very little code.

GridView inline Master/Detail record display

This code drop is part of a smash and grab series. If you're in a rush, you can just grab this code and insert it into your application, no understanding is required. When you have some time (ya, right) you may want to review the source code.

Get Top 1 Record from Dataset

Many of them in need of getting the Top 1 or Top 10 records from a Dataset without going to SQL query. It is possible to do from Code Behind. I have given the code below,
The below code is to get single record from a Dataset. Also I have given for getting 8 records at Green Color.

Enterprize library 4.1 getting output parameter after adding record in db, plz guide



I need to get output parameter (flag) from db after saving record in database. I am using Microsoft Enterprise Library 4.1 for DB. I am inserting record using I Data reader.

Please guide


Inserting personal error message in ValidationSummary



I am creating a web form that requires a lot of validation. I use many of the validation control in asp.net already like RequiredFieldValidator and CompareValidator. 

My Problem: after my custom validation for the value entered return an error message, and I pressed enter key when the field is empty, my custom error message is overlapped by my ValidationSummary. 

Setting my custom error to visible = false on button click also does not seem to work as it requires for me to enter the value first.

This made me think, is there a way to insert my custom validation inside the ValidationSummary as an error message like for other validation control?

Thanks in advance

Gridview Edit on Searching of Record


using Asp.net c#

sql server

i am searching a record from my database and displaying it in gridview now i want the comments should be updated as per the record which is being searched

For E.g if record No.3 is searched then only i can update record no.3 and i don't want rest of data to be shown

now what is happening when i click on edit my whole table is being displayed

this is bcuz i made one method gridfill() which i m calling everytime if i m doing grid row editing,row cancelling and row updating

how i can resolve this thing

my code

 protected void GridView2_RowEditing(object sender, GridViewEditEventArgs e)
        GridView2.EditIndex = e.NewEditIndex;


 protected void GridView2_RowUpdating(object sender, GridViewUpdateEventArgs e)
        string id = GridView2.Rows[e.RowIndex].Cells[0].Text;
        TextBox t;
        t = (TextBox)GridView2.Rows[e.RowIndex].Cells[2].Controls[0];
        string query = "update user1 set comments=@comments where id=@id";
        SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(connstr);
        SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(query, con);

Does this look correct for saving a file/ new record to a database


So thank you for all your help so far, So I think i got this right,
but would like for you all to look it over to see if there is any
areas I might run into trouble with:

//using asp.net mvc 2
the table (sql server 2005, using entities framework)
table fields
"Pattern_Media_GUID  uniqueid 
"Pattern_GUID  uniqueid
"Media varbinary(max)  
"height int
"Width int
"Media_Type String (50)

the form:
<h2> Add Media to this pattern</h2>
<% Html.EnableClientValidation(); %>
<% Html.BeginForm("AddMedia", "Pattern", new { id= Model.Pattern_Guid} , FormMethod.Post, new {enctype = "multipart/form-data"}); %>
    <%: Html.Label("height") %>
    <%: Html.TextBox("height") %>

    <%: Html.Label("width") %>
    <%: Html.TextBox("width") %>

    <%: Html.Label("Media") %>
    <input type="file" id="Media" name="Media" />
    <input type="submit" name=

Inserting rows via stored procedure and under certain conditions


I'm using Dynamic Data with Entity Framework in VS2010.

Let's say my table has these fields:

PersonID (FK)
LocationID (FK)

Hypothetical scenario (it's easier for me to explain this way, so just bear with me for now)... But let's say each row in the table represents "how many items were sold by such-and-such employee at such-and-such location," where location and person are foreign keys which are referencing other tables.  Basically, there should be no more than a ONE row which has a particular combination of Person and Location.  Makes sense?

So, when inserting new rows using my Dynamic Data app, the insert form displays editable fields for Person (dropdown), Location (dropdown), and Items Sold (textbox).  How do I prevent users from inserting another row into the table containing an already-existing combination of Person and Location?   How do I displaying useful feedback to them in the event that they DO attempt to do this?

I have several thoughts about this, but since I'm new to Dynamic Data, I'm not sure which way to go.  For example:

Option 1:  Use "cascading dropdowns" approach in the insert form and only pull in the "allowed" combinations of the two dropd



Is it possible with SQL sorted in descending order according to the word?
In Table I shrajeno Mastercard, Visa, Diners etc ...

All Visa are the first in the order, another Mastercard, etc. ...

Something does not work: ORDER BY PaymentType = 'Visa';

I would not want to work in one field PaymentId (111,222,33, etc. ..) and then use the ORDER BY.

Is this possible in such a way?

Why show only one record?



// Update these variables to values whatever you are storing in your table
        // If you are storing as CARD NUMBER, update this Card Number Attribute Name to CARD NUMBER
        string strCardNumberAttributeName = "Credit card number";
       // string strCardTypeAttributeName = "1";
        string strExpiryDateAttributeName = "Expiry date";
        DataTable dtPaymentDetails = new DataTable();

        string queryString = "SELECT tbl_Payments.PaymentId, tbl_PaymentDetails.AttributeName, tbl_PaymentDetails.Value, tbl_Payments.PaymentType FROM tbl_Payments INNER JOIN tbl_PaymentDetails ON tbl_Payments.ID = tbl_PaymentDetails.PaymentId WHERE ATTRIBUTENAME IN ('" + strCardNumberAttributeName +
                                   "','" + strExpiryDateAttributeName + "') ORDER BY PaymentId";

        string connectionString = "data source=.\\SQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=SSPI;" +
                                           "AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|\\BurnbetDatabase.mdf;User Instance=true";
        using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
            SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
            SqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteR

Can this code be setup to run against the whole database instead of just 1 record at a time?


We have made some changes to this code to start capturing 1 new field of data and updating it as new records are added. But there is currently about 120,000 records more or less.. those records of course dont have the new field populated with anything..

We would like to run this logic that already in place and run it against the tables to update the fields 1 time. I think to make it easier, if it can be setup to expect the "valueTwo" variable, so that we can run it againt the individual codes instead of doing all the records at one time.. there are codes that only have a few records, so it would be best to test initially against the small code group.


            strSqual = "insert into trans (trans_type_name, trans_date,sys_id,mod_user_id,show_ind, remoteCode, techName) values('" & valueTwo & "','" & TransDate & "',"&strSystemID&", 1,'T', '" & dbQuote(strUser) & "', '" & strTechName & "')"        
            'get the new transaction_id out for just inserted alarm   
            strSqual = "select max(transaction_id) as transaction_id from trans"  
            set rst = getStaticRecordSet(strSqual)

Linq qry with order by basic questions


I have never tried a group by with linq, now I do and I'm stuck.

I try to convert this sql statement to its linq counterpart :

SELECT COUNT(tb_Mailer_Smses.Id) AS [cnt], tb_Mailer_mailing.Id As [Id]
,SUM( CASE WHEN tb_Mailer_smses.DLRStatus = 200 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) As [Delivered]
FROM tb_Mailer_mailing INNER JOIN
tb_Mailer_Smses ON tb_Mailer_mailing.Id = tb_Mailer_Smses.MailingId
WHERE tb_Mailer_mailing.ApplicationId = 1
GROUP BY tb_Mailer_mailing.Id

Is there some one who can me show me the convertion process ?

Querying a db for existence of a record.


Can someone suggest, what is the best approach using linq to sql to do the following

1. Check if a row exists in a table for a given criteria and...

2. If it exists return a particular field value else return '0'.

ASP.NetWindows Application  .NET Framework  C#  VB.Net  ADO.Net  
Sql Server  SharePoint  Silverlight  Others  All   

Hall of Fame    Twitter   Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Contact Us    Archives   Tell A Friend