.NET Tutorials, Forums, Interview Questions And Answers
Welcome :Guest
Sign In
Win Surprise Gifts!!!

Top 5 Contributors of the Month
david stephan
Gaurav Pal
Post New Web Links

SQL Server Compact loses change tracking anchors when copied to device

Posted By:      Posted Date: August 28, 2010    Points: 0   Category :Sql Server
I have a device app that use SQL Compact and uses sync framework to synchronize to a SQL Server 2008 instance.  In order to speed up the initial synchronization of my device app, I'm creating the database (.sdf) using the sync framework on the server based on the suggestion in this article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd938879.aspx#HandlingInitialSynchronizationandExpiredSubscriptions Then I get it via a WCF service down to the device app.  I'm able to download the db and it has data.  When I sync however, the database doesn't seem to think it is syncronized.  It seems to have lost it's anchors.   The following code returns an anchor for my State table on the server, but not after copying it to the device. Any suggestions are appreciated.  Thanks FPASQLCeClientSyncProvider).GetTableReceivedAnchor("State")

View Complete Post

More Related Resource Links

SQL Server Compact Edition Device Deployment


We're building a custom PC installation package to deploy our .NET Compact Framework 3.5 / SQL Server Compact Edition based application.  The installation package uses the System.Configuration.Install and calls Process.Start(ceAppPath, iniPath). We are targeting ARM and x86 devices.  Specifically, which SQL Server Compact Edition cab files do we need to install/deploy for our application to run on the these device platforms?

SQL CE 4.0 : There is not enough memory on the device running SQL Server Compact to complete this op


There is not enough memory on the device running SQL Server Compact to complete this operation.

I just had a customer report this issue -- it gets reported as soon as the app connects to the database.  

Is this a RAM issue or is there something else I should be looking at?  The requirements are 1GB of free RAM for my app, as it never goes above 250mb of used RAM.



Go Mobile: Create Compact, Robust Mobile Apps with SQL Server CE 2.0 and the .NET Compact Framework


Developers have myriad options when it comes to creating solutions for mobile devices. One of the greatest challenges facing mobile developers is finding a compact yet robust local storage solution. SQL Server CE 2.0 promises to deliver on both fronts. This new release represents a tremendous leap in terms of features and performance over its predecessor. This article will review some of the platform and tools choices developers have today. The authors will compare and contrast the significant new features in SQL Server CE 2.0 with the previous release. Following that, they will build a sample app for illustration.

Mark Brown and David Meunier

MSDN Magazine January 2003

Getting Started with SQL Server Compact 4.0 and ASP.NET 4

The article Getting Started with SQL Server Compact 4.0 and ASP.NET 4 was added by tmorton on Monday, August 09, 2010.

While professional developers are waiting for the Visual Studio Tools and Designers for SQL Server Compact 4.0, I will show how impatient developers can include SQL Server Compact with ASP.NET applications, and use it from ASP.NET pages. Previously, you

MSSQL 2008 R2: Change Server Collation Steps, with user DBs already of desired collation

On the default instance of SQL Server 2008 R2, I want to change the server collation from the usual US default SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS to an application vendor's required collation, Latin1_General_BIN.  I understand that changing the server collation is essentially the same as changing the collation of databases master and model -- is that a fair statement? But my main question is, since there are user databases on the server that I would like to preserve, can I not simply detatch the user DBs prior to performing the server collation change, and then reattach?  The database collation of the user databases is already set to Latin1_General_BIN.  This article, Setting and Changing the Server Collation, at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179254.aspx says that to preserve the user databases, I should script all DB objects out, and bulk-copy all data out, because the DBs will have to be recreated and repopulated.  Can someone explain why I ought not simply detach and reattach the user DBs, given that they are already of the desired collation (i.e., the same collation that I will be changing the server collation to)? Your help much appreciated. -Tom

Creating a recordset using VBA in Excel with SQL Server Compact

I have create a SQL Server Compact database from VBA in Excel.  So far so good.  Now I want to access the database via a recordset.  here is my code.        Set recSet = New ADODB.Recordset        recSet.LockType = adLockBatchOptimistic     recSet.CursorType = adOpenKeyset     Call recSet.Open("SELECT * FROM SPAR", dbConn)   When I run this I get and error in Call recSet.Open("SELECT * FROM SPAR", dbConn):Errors Occurred, [,,,,]  I have search many forums about his problem, but I still can't see where the error is from.  I am using Excel 2003, and SQL Server Compact 3.5   Regards, Peter

ODBC Driver for SQL Server Compact Edition

I know that there is no ODBC driver available for SQL Server Compact Edition version 3.5.  Do you plan to add an ODBC driver in future release? If yes, is it high in your priority list?   The scenario why I am looking for an ODBC driver is to connect an MS Access application to a SDF file instead of MDB file.  This will enable me to easily sync the SDF file with SQL server repository using the new Data Sync Services.   Mario Cardinal MVP Solutions Architect

SQL Server Compact 4 replication library bug ?

I get the subscriber connection string from a SqlCeReplication object like so: public string GetFullConnectionString(string connectionString) { using (SqlCeReplication repl = new SqlCeReplication()) { repl.SubscriberConnectionString = connectionString; return repl.SubscriberConnectionString; } } With a connection string of: "Data Source=C:\data\nw(40).sdf" I get this from 3.5.8081: ssce:default lock timeout="5000";data source="C:\Data\nw.sdf";ssce:max database size="256";ssce:max buffer size="4096";ssce:temp file max size="256";ssce:enlist="True";ssce:default lock escalation="100";ssce:autoshrink threshold="60";ssce:flush interval="10"; But I get this from 4.0 CTP 1: "Autoshrink Threshold=\"60\";Case Sensitive=\"False\";Data Source=\"C:\\data\\nw40.sdf\";Default Lock Escalation=\"100\";Default Lock Timeout=\"5000\";Encrypt Database=\"False\";Encryption Mode=\"\";Enlist=\"True\";Mode=\"Read Write\";Flush Interval=\"10\";Locale Identifier=\"-1\";Max Buffer Size=\"4096\";Max Database Size=\"256\";Password=\"\";Persist Security Info=\"False\";Temp File Max Size=\"256\";Temp File Directory=\"

SQL Server Compact 3.5 Encryption Questions

If I create a database (.sdf file) on a server and set it to be encrypted, should it be able to be opened on a device or other PC?  In other words, is there anything in the encryption that is machine specific?  Or is it really that the password is what lets me connect and the encryption prevents it from being read by some other tool like a hex file viewer as one post suggested. I've read through lots of posts and documentation and I'm just trying to understand how encryption works and if there are any limitations or considerations and haven't found a good source. Thanks

Chunking to ntext / image columns in SQL Server Compact 3.5

Hi all! I'm trying to store (potentially) large files in a SDF, via a table with an image column.  Image columns hold up to 2GB. Every SQL CE example I've found which does this reads the whole file into a Byte array, then passes the array in a SqlCeParameter.   This is fine assuming that the file is small, or the code is run on a machine with plenty of memory.  But if, for example, you're trying to store a 1GB file on a PC with 512Mb, the whole file cannot be buffered in one go (without paging). What I want to be able to do is read and store "chunks" of a file into an image col.  E.g. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317034    I think this approach is both faster and more mem efficient.   It is possible on SQL Server 2008 etc., using either UPDATETEXT or UPDATE ... [column name].write( ..., ..., ...).   However, SQL CE doesn't appear to support either syntax. So, I guess my question boils down to: is it possible to store a 2Gb file in an SQL CE image column on a PC with 1GB of mem. (without spending ages paging) Thanks in advance, Ben.

SQL Server to SQL Server Compact Edition Database Copy

I recently switched from XP to Win 7 and am getting an error when using the SQL Server to SQL Server Compact Edition Database Copy wizard from johnnycantcode.com (link). I suspect that the problem is with the configuration of the path for the DQL CE dll. 1) Does anyone know where the configuration is set? It isn't in the GLT.SqlCopy.exe.config file in the local directory. 2) Has anyone got the program to run under Win 7? Thanks marc  

SQL server compact deployment help

I have a very simple windows desktop app I am trying to deploy using windows installer. I also have a SQL Server compact database file or (Local Database). When I deploy the app and try installing it on my test computer, I get an error saying the database was not found and then it displays the connection string that was set originally in Visual Studio. The application runs but all the database in not there. I don't understand why there is even a connection string there if the database in embedded in the application. Which is one of the benefits of SQL Server  Compact. What should change the connection string to?? Anyone have experience using SQl Server Compact for Win Forms?

Will SQL Server Compact feature an updated and more capable OLEDB driver

Hi, Earlier, we found problems with using SQL CE 3.5 via OLEDB. While some limited functionality was available and data can be accessed via commands and recordset via OLEDB/ADO from, say, Excel or Access, we were unable to access SQL CE directly from other data-driven packages that nominally support OLEDB, most importantly SAS and SPSS. So our question is whether SQL Server Compact will feature an updated and more capable OLEDB driver? Thx and regards, Ralph


A question on the behaviour of the SYS_CHANGE_CONTEXT in relation to Change Tracking... Our overall application is to facilitate mobile clients connecting to a central server => SQL Server Change Tracking provides a great set of services in this area. However, ideally we want to prevent a client's own changes being reflected back to itself and had hoped to use the "With Change Context" facility to achieve this. One scenario + associated behaviour we've seen during prototyping is as below: - client has successfully sync'ed ... - server makes an update to a given Row with context SERVER - client then applies an update to a different column in the same Row with context CLIENT-<n> ... - client (CLIENT-<n>) seeks to retrieve its updates since the last successful sync.   At this point, while the <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Calisto MT"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-alt:"Century Gothic"; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNor

how can I open a sql compact 4.0 DB from VS 2010 server explorer ?

Hi, I've downloaded the latest sql compact 4.0 beta, and I follow the Scott Guthrie sample (http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/07/16/code-first-development-with-entity-framework-4.aspx). It is working as expected, the DB is created. However, I cannot open the DB in the server explorer of VS (neither from sql management studio). An error telling me the version of the file is not supported is thrown. Note that I only have the 3.5 version in the provider list in the add connection wizard. What is missing ? thanks in advance for the help. stevePaying back the community for its help by writing articles : Have a Nice Day.Net Blog

Failed to change Farm Account in Sharepoint 2010 server, now Central Administration is not accessibl

Hello, I have a problem, that I no longer can access Central Administration Website, only the Sharepoint itself. I was running installation of Sharepoint 2010 Server with administrative account ImTheAdmin, who is a Domain Admin in the domain on one of the Windows 2008 R2 member servers. Besides that, I made ImTheAdmin the primary administrator of the Sharepoint. ImTheAdmin became the only user of this Sharepoint 2010 server after installation.  I installed everything on one box with default installation settings. I used builtin SQL server, not Standard or Enterprise. What then happened is: Using ImTheAdmin account, I opened Central Administration Website, and it said, that I need to change the Farm Account, for the account for Farm was the default one (I think it was network service). So I created a regular domain user MYDOMAIN\SharepointFarmAccount. The account name was too long to be as a Windows 2000 name, so it showed there without last 't', e.g. MYDOMAIN\SharepointFarmAccoun. I thought, Windows 2000 is long gone, so I didn't pay much attention, I think everywhere the account SID is important. I don't know if that is the real problem with my failure later, but it might be one of the reasons. I put MYDOMAIN\SharepointFarmAccount down in to the form of Central Administration Website, added the check mark, that it would react to password changes, and pre
ASP.NetWindows Application  .NET Framework  C#  VB.Net  ADO.Net  
Sql Server  SharePoint  Silverlight  Others  All   

Hall of Fame    Twitter   Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Contact Us    Archives   Tell A Friend