.NET Tutorials, Forums, Interview Questions And Answers
Welcome :Guest
Sign In
Register
 
Win Surprise Gifts!!!
Congratulations!!!


Top 5 Contributors of the Month
Kaviya Balasubramanian
Sgraph Infotech
Imran Ghani
Post New Web Links

Deprecated VariationsLabelEcbMenu

Posted By:      Posted Date: August 26, 2010    Points: 0   Category :SharePoint
 

Hello, I'm developing a site with variations of language in sp2010  and in the documentation saids that  the object VariationsLabelEcbMenu is deprecated .

What is to be used?

Thank you.




View Complete Post


More Related Resource Links

Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010: Deprecated Types and Methods

  
This resource contains text files that list all of the deprecated types and methods in Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007.

HELP with SQL MAIL, a deprecated feature of SQL

  
I understand that SQL MAIL is a deprecated feature of SQL, thru SQL 2008r2.  However, I am despirate to continue using the READ and DELETE funcationality as long as I can.  Anyway... I am running SQL 2005 (build # 9.0.4262).  I am connecting to a company Exchange account via the SQL MAIL / MAPI system procedures. I am very sure my code is good, as it runs on three different SQL installations, every 10 minutes.  I eliminate 'auto reply', 'user replies', etc. from my three different account inboxes, and therefore keep those inboxes very clean. I am unable to get the process "xp_findnextmsg" to return a message-ID for any messages with "Undeliverable:" in the subject line.  I did send one 'TEST' email (from my account) into the account inbox and "xp_findnextmsg" does return a message-ID for that one.  My research indicates that the "Undeliverable:" replies from Exchange servers may have special headers. Has anyone else encountered this issue, and/or a solution? I have accumulated over 600 "Undeliverable" messages in my inbox, as my MS Report Server 2005 uses this account for Subscriptions.  I would love to read the Subject and first 'x' characters of Body into a SQL table, so I can build SSRS reports back out to report/subscription owners.

Alternative to deprecated xp_readmail in MSSQL

  
I have inherited an MSSQL2000 application that uses xp_findnextmsg & xp_readmail to extract stuff from emails & insert it into the db.   It will need to be upgraded sometime soon, either to 2005 or perhaps 2008:  However, I note that both xp_findnextmsg & xp_readmail are deprecated, & that Database Mail is apparently for sending only, not for reading.  Have I got this wrong?   This would not appear to be a unique need.  Any clues gratefully received.   regards, Ian

HELP with SQL MAIL, a deprecated feature of SQL

  
I understand that SQL MAIL is a deprecated feature of SQL, thru SQL 2008r2.  However, I am despirate to continue using the READ and DELETE funcationality as long as I can.  Anyway... I am running SQL 2005 (build # 9.0.4262).  I am connecting to a company Exchange account via the SQL MAIL / MAPI system procedures. I am very sure my code is good, as it runs on three different SQL installations, every 10 minutes.  I eliminate 'auto reply', 'user replies', etc. from my three different account inboxes, and therefore keep those inboxes very clean. I am unable to get the process "xp_findnextmsg" to return a message-ID for any messages with "Undeliverable:" in the subject line.  I did send one 'TEST' email (from my account) into the account inbox and "xp_findnextmsg" does return a message-ID for that one.  My research indicates that the "Undeliverable:" replies from Exchange servers may have special headers. Has anyone else encountered this issue, and/or a solution? I have accumulated over 600 "Undeliverable" messages in my inbox, as my MS Report Server 2005 uses this account for Subscriptions.  I would love to read the Subject and first 'x' characters of Body into a SQL table, so I can build SSRS reports back out to report/subscription owners.

COM Interop , OleAutomation and the deprecated IDispatchImpl attribute...

  
Hi all, At my work, we have «deeply connected » COM libraries written in the good old days of VB6. Those components can be indifferently called from other components, ASP pages or VBScripts. We want to progressively migrate those components in C# using COM interoperability. After doing some tests, I came upon some “weird” interop behaviors... I’ve managed to make some rather simple examples of my problems; here it goes…   The Tests For our migration scenario, let’s take 4 classes in 4 distinct VB6 libraries each containing a single class. Here’s the dependency graph of the libraries:   Now the call graph of two very simple tests: In the first test, an ASP/VBScript instantiates a DataClass then passes it on to the method ClassB::RunBC , which in turns instantiates and calls a ClassC::CalledByB passing the reference to the DataClass along. The 2nd test is modeled after the first one: ClassC::RunCD calls ClassD::CalledByC still passing a reference to third party object DataClass .   In other words, the ClassC can be called from either VB6 or ASP/VBScript. After compilation of all the projects, here’s the output of the test script:   Now let’s try to migrate LibraryC in C#... Before starting to write anything in C#, we first need to generate interop assemblies for both LibraryA and LibraryD (which

Deprecated Features - Sysindexes table

  

Hi All,

I read an article about deprecated features and sysindexes is marked as not supported under list "Features Not Supported in a Future Version of SQL Server" (system tables).

However I am surprised to see that sp_udpatestats procedure still uses sysindexes table for picking up rowmodctr column for verifying the indexes that got modified after last stats calculation, and this procedure is not using the new DMV's introduced in SQL 2005 like physical index stats, stats calculated date, last_user_modified_date etc.

Also sp_updatestats is not marked for deprecation. When applications depending on SQL server are modifying the code/re-writting to move to the new catalog views/DMV's, I would expect SQL Server system stored procedures also get modified accordingly.

It's just a thought and never know if MS can consider this request...

Thanks,

Kumar


Thanks, Kumar

dynamic order by deprecated in ms sql 2005?

  

Hi, I am pretty sure the code below compiled on ms sql 2000 and it doesn't compile on ms sql 2005.  I know the code below won't compile (create a proc if code below is in the proc) in ms sql 2005.   Is there any replacement short of exec (@sql1).  I hate execs.

ORDER

 

BY

 

 

CASE LEFT(@sort,1)

 

 

WHEN 'T' THEN f.oid

WHEN 'F' THEN fromoid

WHEN 'L' THEN c.acct

WHEN 'I' THEN e.item

END,

CASE substring(@sort,1,1)

WHEN 'T' THEN f.oid

WHEN 'F' THEN fromoid

WHEN 'L' THEN c.acct

WHEN 'I' THEN e.item

END,

CASE substring(@sort,2,1)

WHEN 'T' THEN f.oid

WHEN 'F'

Is System.Data.OracleClient.dll deprecated?

  

I have a web application that has been using the System.Data.OracleClient.dll for the past 3 years. Recently we've been having some performance issues on the database server and it appears that this app is now causing problems when connecting to our Oracle database.

I've found an updated client at the Oracle website: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/dotnet/index-085163.html

My question is: Is it necessary for me to update to this new client?

We are running Oracle 11g on 64-bit servers in a cluster.

The app is running on a Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit machine using ASP.NET 4.0. The app was built using Visual Studio 2005 Team Suite on a 32-bit machine. It was re-compiled on a 64-bit machine and imported into Visual Studio 2010 Professional in order to switch the target framework to .NET 4.0. Then it was deployed to the server. This basically updated the Web.config file for us, the rest of the site remains the same as before.

All suggestions and thoughts are welcome.

Thanks


Logical Records Deprecated?

  

According to books online, Logical Record Relationships are deprecated (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms146865(v=SQL.100).aspx).

Is there anything going to replace this feature?


Categories: 
ASP.NetWindows Application  .NET Framework  C#  VB.Net  ADO.Net  
Sql Server  SharePoint  Silverlight  Others  All   

Hall of Fame    Twitter   Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Contact Us    Archives   Tell A Friend