.NET Tutorials, Forums, Interview Questions And Answers
Welcome :Guest
Sign In
Register
 
Win Surprise Gifts!!!
Congratulations!!!


Top 5 Contributors of the Month
Easy Web
Imran Ghani
Post New Web Links

Serving the Web: Stored Procedure Wizard in Visual Basic Boosts Productivity

Posted By:      Posted Date: August 21, 2010    Points: 0   Category :ASP.Net
 

More Related Resource Links

Unable to select any stored procedure while creating TableAdapters in wizard

  

I'm using VS 2008 and SQL 2008.

I have created the tables and the stored procedures in SQL 2008.

In VS 2008, I created DataSet1.xsd in App_Code and created the connectionString in web.config file.

Then when I go into the DataSet1.xsd and try to add a TableAdapter, strange things happened.

First I chose the data connection, then selected "Use existing stored procedure", then there was nothing listed in the dropdownlists (in Select, Insert, Update, or Delete). 

I'm sure the connectionString is correct because if I choose "Use SQL statement" and type in a "select * from mytable1", the TableAdapter can be created without any problem.

Any suggestions?


Visual Studio SQL Connection Wizard - where are values stored?

  
I have a problem with the Configuration Manager and though clearing the cached information would help, but I can't find how to do that.The problem - No matter how many times I try to create a new connection to an existing database, the wizard retrieves an incorrect listing of the tables for that database (this is just one database it is happening with).  I try creating different users in SQL Management Studio (which shows the proper tables) and I can connect fine with the new user, but these incorrect tables keep appearing. This only applies to the aspnet membership tables that, at one point I had named with an extra prefix (eg vw_aspnet_Users) but are no longer named as such. Now, only the vw-prefix tables show up and they don't exist anymore. Also I have made some of my own tables (eg aspnet_User_Info) which don't ahow up at all. When I make other new tables though, they seem to show up fine. Also, if I manually construct the query through the wizard, it will properly access the tables that don't show up.So, Is there someone I can clear/refresh wherever this information is being cached? Removing everything from the Web.config does nothing, as Visual Studio seems to save the connections elsewhere (connection strings from other projects show up in the wizard as well)Any tips are appreciated

Creating BCS entity for a SQL stored procedure that has parameters using visual studio

  

Hi Everyone,

                 can anyone help me in creating  BCS entity using BCDM model in visual studio using Linq to sql query for a SQL stored procedure.I am receiving remote debugging error and few other errors.Your step by step approach helps me a lot,I have been playing with this for long,but still no answer.

 

Thanks ,
Ashwin


Selecting Oracle Stored Procedure in SSRS Crashes Visual Studio 2005 IDE

  

Problem Conditions

I have a very simple Oracle (11g) Stored Procedure that is declared like so:

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE pr_myproc(L_CURSOR out SYS_REFCURSOR)
is
   
BEGIN
     OPEN L_CURSOR FOR
       SELECT
* FROM MyTable;
   
END;

This compiles correctly. The cursor contains col1, col2 and col3.

In SSRS, i have a Shared Data Source that uses Oracle OLEDB Provider for Oracle 11g:

Provider=OraOLEDB.Oracle.1;

Stored Procedure stopped working in Visual Studio 2010; System.Data.SqlClient disabled?

  

Hi,

In Visual Studio 2010, I have a webform, with a button that attempts to manipulate a SQL table that has a lot of data (several years & archives of 12 people's emails: emailID, bodies, to, cc, bcc, date/time).  Problem has always been that with so many emails (500,000), I had to break up the manipulation jobs a bit, or VisualStudio/ASP.Net development server would freeze up running those SQL stored procedures.

So I determined, for each (.pst) email store, a unique series that was in each emailID - for instance, person A would have 00000195195xxxxx as their emailIDs, and person B would have 00000123456xxxxxx as their email IDs - and used those 30 [or so] identifying flags to recursively call a function that until yesterday was running my SQL stored procedures just fine. 

YEsterday, while that was running, for giggles, I rebuilt the index on my table, and freaked out the development server by accident.  I had to rollback the database using SQL Server Management Studio, or the database was "Suspect".

Now, my SQL Stored Procedure in that recursively called function won't run, despite the fact that the original SQL Query [that gets the identifying flags into a Datatable, and runs the sproc on each "row"] works just fine.

I think it's a setting, to protect me ... but can't

Stored Procedure stopped working in Visual Studio 2010; System.Data.SqlClient disabled?

  

Hi,

In Visual Studio 2010, I have a webform, with a button that attempts to manipulate a SQL table that has a lot of data (several years & archives of 12 people's emails: emailID, bodies, to, cc, bcc, date/time).  Problem has always been that with so many emails (500,000), I had to break up the manipulation jobs a bit, or VisualStudio/ASP.Net development server would freeze up running those SQL stored procedures.

So I determined, for each (.pst) email store, a unique series that was in each emailID - for instance, person A would have 00000195195xxxxx as their emailIDs, and person B would have 00000123456xxxxxx as their email IDs - and used those 30 [or so] identifying flags to recursively call a function that until yesterday was running my SQL stored procedures just fine. 

YEsterday, while that was running, for giggles, I rebuilt the index on my table, and freaked out the development server by accident.  I had to rollback the database using SQL Server Management Studio, or the database was "Suspect".

Now, my SQL Stored Procedure in that recursively called function won't run, despite the fact that the original SQL Query [that gets the identifying flags into a Datatable, and runs the sproc on each "row"] works just fine.

I think it's a setting, to protect me ... but can't

How to run Office macros by using Automation from Visual Basic .NET

  
This step-by-step article describes how to call Office macros from a Visual Basic .NET Automation client.

You can use Microsoft Office Automation to open a document or create a new document that contains a Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) macro and execute the macro at run time.

Dynamically Create Controls in ASP.NET with Visual Basic .NET

  
This step-by-step article describes how to dynamically create controls for an ASPX Web page.

The sample project does the following:
It creates two TextBox controls.
It verifies that the TextBox contents (TextBox.text) and attributes are saved across posts to the server.
It describes how events that are posted by a dynamically created control are handled.

Send Email from SQL Server Express Using a CLR Stored Procedure

  
Problem
One of the nice things about SQL Server is the ability to send email using T-SQL. The downside is that this functionality does not exist in SQL Server Express. In this tip I will show you how to build a basic CLR stored procedure to send email messages from SQL Server Express, although this same technique could be used for any version of SQL Server.

Solution
If you have not yet built a CLR stored procedure, please refer to this tip for what needs to be done for the initial setup.

Inserting rows via stored procedure and under certain conditions

  

I'm using Dynamic Data with Entity Framework in VS2010.

Let's say my table has these fields:

MyTable
ID (PK)
PersonID (FK)
LocationID (FK)
TotalItemsSold

Hypothetical scenario (it's easier for me to explain this way, so just bear with me for now)... But let's say each row in the table represents "how many items were sold by such-and-such employee at such-and-such location," where location and person are foreign keys which are referencing other tables.  Basically, there should be no more than a ONE row which has a particular combination of Person and Location.  Makes sense?

So, when inserting new rows using my Dynamic Data app, the insert form displays editable fields for Person (dropdown), Location (dropdown), and Items Sold (textbox).  How do I prevent users from inserting another row into the table containing an already-existing combination of Person and Location?   How do I displaying useful feedback to them in the event that they DO attempt to do this?

I have several thoughts about this, but since I'm new to Dynamic Data, I'm not sure which way to go.  For example:

Option 1:  Use "cascading dropdowns" approach in the insert form and only pull in the "allowed" combinations of the two dropd

Categories: 
ASP.NetWindows Application  .NET Framework  C#  VB.Net  ADO.Net  
Sql Server  SharePoint  Silverlight  Others  All   

Hall of Fame    Twitter   Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Contact Us    Archives   Tell A Friend