.NET Tutorials, Forums, Interview Questions And Answers
Welcome :Guest
Sign In
Win Surprise Gifts!!!

Top 5 Contributors of the Month
Gaurav Pal
Post New Web Links

WCF calls from a Mac

Posted By:      Posted Date: September 09, 2010    Points: 0   Category :WCF
Hi there, I have written a WCF service that is being used by various application but now a colleage of mine needs to write an application for a Mac and needs to use the service from there. I understood that because WCF is based on SOAP that he should be able to consume the service. How would we be going about to do that? To keep it simple we are using BasicHttpBinding to be able to use SOAP 1.1, but we can't generate the client proxies - which is dead easy on the Windows box but not so easy on a Mac. Any help will do!

View Complete Post

More Related Resource Links

Using JQuery to perform Ajax calls in ASP.NET MVC

The muscle behind the actual asynchronous calls comes from JavaScript. I looked around at a bunch of existing JavaScript libraries and settled on JQuery because of the way it leverages existing CSS knowledge. The three things that the library should do easily are:

Speed SQL: Tuning Your Database Calls with Tier Interaction Profiling


Tier interaction profiling (TIP) is a feature of the Visual Studio profiling tools that measures the duration of synchronous calls to ADO.NET-compliant data stores. We'll show you how TIP works and provide some best practices for using TIP to diagnose performance problems in your apps.

Mark Friedman

MSDN Magazine August 2010

Extreme ASP.NET: Client-Side Web Service Calls with AJAX Extensions


Microsoft AJAX Library and the ASP.NET 2.0 AJAX Extensions provide a number of compelling features ranging from client-side data binding, to DHTML animations and behaviors. Learn all about them here.

Fritz Onion

MSDN Magazine January 2007

WCF Essentials: What You Need To Know About One-Way Calls, Callbacks, And Events


Object and component-oriented programming have only one way for clients to call a method, but Windows® Communication Foundation introduces two more. In this article Juval Lowy explains how they work.

Juval Lowy

MSDN Magazine October 2006

.NET Delegates: Making Asynchronous Method Calls in the .NET Environment


One of the many great features of the .NET Framework is that it has asynchronous infrastructure built in. In .NET you can call any method asynchronously by defining a delegate for the method and calling the delegate's asynchronous methods. This is beneficial to your application because when a synchronous call is made, the calling thread is blocked until the method completes whereas an asynchronous call is made on a different thread, and this allows the original thread to continue its work while the asynchronous call is in progress.This article explains delegates in .NET and how to use them to perform asynchronous calls, eliminating age-old threading problems.

Richard Grimes

MSDN Magazine August 2001

Windows 2000: Asynchronous Method Calls Eliminate the Wait for COM Clients and Servers


Windows 2000 is the first version of COM to support asynchronous method calls, which permit clients to make nonblocking calls to COM objects and objects to process incoming calls without blocking the calling threads. COM clients benefit from asynchronous method calls because they can continue working while waiting for outbound calls to return. Objects benefit because they can queue incoming calls and service them from a thread pool. Our SieveClient and SieveServer sample apps demonstrate how to create and use asynchronous clients and servers in COM-based distributed applications.

Jeff Prosise

MSDN Magazine April 2000

ListView calls ObjectDataSource SelectMethod when setting InsertItemPosition


I have a ListView that is bound to an ObjectDataSource. I want to create a new insert item when the user clicks on a button on the form. I do this by reacting to the button click event on the postback. In the button click event, I set ListView.InsertItemPosition = InsertItemPosition.FirstItem.


        protected void NewButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
            // This line causes the ListView's ObjectDataSource to call its SelectMethod
            // Removing this line, the SelectMethod is NOT called.
            itemsListView.InsertItemPosition = InsertItemPosition.FirstItem;


This works, but for some reason the ObjectDataSource's SelectMethod is executed again.

Is there a reason why the SelectMethod of the ObjectDataSource is being called when the ListView's InsertItemPosition is set from None to FirstItem?


jQuery calls asmx web service

I have a jQuery method that calls a .asmx web service.  the jquery method only executes one time but the web serivce executes multiple times.  Is there a way this could happen or ways to debug this beyond breakpoints in the c# code and alerts in the jQuery.

Function calls

I want to be able to call my Login() process and Logout() process on each funtion call within a class.e.g.class Something { private Login() {...} private Logout() {...} public dosomething1() {...} public dosomething2() {...} public dosomething3() {...} } So when I call any of the dosomething functions, they automatically call the Login funtion and then does the dosomething function and finally does the Logout.What I'd really like is the ability to do something like this:{  Login()  Overidesomething()  Logout()}Where I can pass the dosomething functions to replace the overidesomething function.

How can I maintain "state" across WCF method calls?

I need to retrieve very large portions of NTFS files (as byte arrays) from a WCF Service.  The needed portions of the files are far too large to efficiently return in a single request, so I need a "chunky" implementation that will return just a portion of the file on each method call. But the entire process needs to be very fast... specifically: I need to avoid the overhead of re-opening the file each time the client requests the next "chunk". So how can I keep the filestream open on the service-side in anticipation of the next request from the client for the next chunk? And if no subsequent request arrives, then close the filestream? That is, implement "lazy close". Or stated another way: Does the code instantiated on the service-side to service an incoming method call remain "alive" after the method returns to the caller?  Or can it be configured that way, like a Singleton SAO behaves in Remoting?? Thanks, DT 

Making and receiving calls using e Diva Component API

Programs and scripts can use the Component API in either 'blocking' or 'non-blocking' mode. The following examples use 'blocking' mode because this is the simplest. For more complex scripts and applications 'non-blocking' mode can make it easier to create programs that can cope with unforeseen sequences of events or errors.
See the section 'Handling multiple calls' for more information.

We can create the DivaCall object directly here because we are handling only one call; if we were creating more than one DivaCall object then we would have to use DivaSystem and DivaInstance and the DivaCall objects would be created using the CreateCall method of DivaInstance.

To make a call
The following code makes a call with Connect , plays the wave file with SendVoiceFile when the call is answered and Disconnects.

Making asynchronous calls to web services during ASP.NET page processing

Some ASP.NET web applications use web services to get some data that they display to users. Some pages may lay hardly on web services and these pages need some optimization to work better. In this posting I will show you how to use web services behind your ASP.NET page asynchronously and perform a lot of queries to web services. Sample code included! Eneta.Examples.WebAppThreading.zip VS2008 solution | 60KB Asynchronous page processing As an introduction let's see how ASP.NET supports asynchronous calls behind pages. Although we can use our own threading mechanism and avoid what is offered by ASP.NET it is more safe and time saving to use ASP.NET own infrastructure. The image on right that I stole from MSDN article Asynchronous Pages in ASP.NET 2.0 shows you how synchronous and asynchronous pages are processed by ASP.NET. I recommend to read this MSDN article because you can find also other methods for asynchronous calls. I will introduce you how to use PageAsyncTask based calls. If you look at diagram on right you can see that asynchronous processing of registered tasks happens between PreRender and PreRenderComplete events in separate threads. If we have data bound controls on our page we have to move data binding to PreRenderComplete event because this is the closest phase of page processing where asynchronous calls are finished.

Schema Specific Procedure Calls

Hi , I have two schemas Say S1 and S2 . I have two procedures inside each of this schema say S1.P1 and S1.P2 for S1 and S2.P1 and S2.P2 for S2 . Is it possible to call S1.P2 from S1.P1 ? . it is possible to do this like EXEC [S1].P2 , but Wat I want to know is to 1) call EXEC statement directly without [S1] prefix and execute the target Procedure which belong to the same schema of the calling Procedure ?. Currently wat I am facing is when I try to call EXEC P1 it looks for Default Schema (dbo.P1) and throwing a "procedure not found" error . 2)Is there a way to get the current schema name inside  the SP while the  SP is executing ?

Create an Event Handler to catch calls to Create.aspx

Hi, I want to research creating an event handler/reciever to catch calls (mouse clicks) to Create.aspx to prevent users having the ability to create new content. I've noticed in VS2010 the templates for Event Recivers you do not get anything similar that I could use as a starting point (List Events, List Item Events etc) Any ideas how I can define a new type of event receiver?

Bi directional service calls with "n to 1" and "1 to n" servers has host

Hey there.   I've been tasked to find out how to do the following for our company:   We have our ERP (MS Navision) exposed to the net to take orders. So far so good. Now management wants me to integrate our system with 3 other ERPs and 100s to 1000s of clients all having their own networks and sql servers which are completely outside of our "control".   Here's where I have a big problem.  In the "normal" way of things, each of the ERP, installed on each of our 100[0]s of big clients would be calling my services to process orders and whatnot.   However, the first step of our system is to do a search and display inventory.  We want to have complete control has this system is a new flagship product and we can't let other companies duplicate it.  The big sticking points for our clients is that they want us to show THEIR inventory on OUR site.  This happens after a login, but before their servers ever call mine. That means that I have to query their webservices first... 100[0]s of different servers (1 per client allowed on the system).   Now if we had only 2-5 clients I'd know what to do, but how can I have a scalable setup with 100s and possibly 5000+ different clients? 

Deadlocking in stored proc calls (sql 2008)


The deadlock revolves around 3 tables (A, B, and C), shown simplified below.


Table “A”:


     [A_ID] [bigint] NOT NULL,

     [A_DeleteID] [bigint] NULL,


URGENT: HElp with AJAx Xmlhttp calls


I have a client js script which calls server aspx pages 

Both are on same domain ctually localhost.

but when I do a XMLHTTPREQUEST I get 500 Internal error, service not available.

If I run both application under debug mode then all works fine.

But when I publish and run, it does not work.

ASP.NetWindows Application  .NET Framework  C#  VB.Net  ADO.Net  
Sql Server  SharePoint  Silverlight  Others  All   

Hall of Fame    Twitter   Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Contact Us    Archives   Tell A Friend